- Does Someone You Know Enjoy Being Miserable?
- Get Some Coffee Friends!
- Add Some Muscle to your Grievance Procedure
- CA Reject Morrison Vicarious Liability Appeal
- Managing With a Growth Mind Set
- Employee Accountability
- Bribery at Work
- What is the Reasonable Employer?
- Something to Celebrate?
- When Does Custom and Practice Affect Contract Terms?
- Take a (Short) Break
- When Leaders Are Tired
- Helping Employees Combat Loneliness
- Should Employers Provide Financial Education for Staff?
- Get it Noted
- Are You Feeling Perky?
- Developing Employee Responsibility
- Leaving it Too Late
- Are You Sourcing Top Talent For Your Business?
- Are You Allowing Your Top Performers to Compensate for Weaker Ones?
- Holiday Pay for Atypical Workers
- Responsibility for Employee Engagement
- Does The Appearance of The Sun Cause Your Staff to Disappear?
- What Do You Look For in Your Recruits?
- Helping Your Employees to Engage
- Reference Requests
- Chronic Mondayitis
- The Investigatory Rant
- How to Tackle Incompetence in the Workplace
- How to Deal with Annoying Colleagues
Are You Allowing Your Top Performers to Compensate for Weaker Ones?
Some time ago I was asked to investigate the apparent gross misconduct of a senior manager, John. He had gone from being an incredibly high-performing, conscientious individual to a major problem. During the course of the investigation several people said things like: “it’s completely unlike him. It’s as though a switch had flipped”.
When I met him I realised there was something seriously wrong. He was jabbering away at about twice the speed of normal speech and though he was using English, he made no sense at all. I arranged a medical and my fears were confirmed. He had worked so hard that he’d had a breakdown.
Regrettably, this isn’t an unusual experience for high performers: A study published last year by Dr Howard Awbery found that the mental health of 20% of the top-performing leaders of UK businesses is affected by burnout.
In part corporate burnout may be attributable to the work practices of the employees themselves. In John’s case he had been told several times not to over-do things and to cut back on his workload – but he didn’t.
But it isn’t the full story. Many businesses do things - often unknowingly - that make it more likely that their top performers will become ill.
- High performers are put on the hardest projects all the time. It’s understandable to want your best people on the most important projects. But if you keep going to the same small group of people over and over again, you run the risk of overloading them and causing burnout.
- The best performers are regularly used to compensate for weaker team members. Such people are expected to support weaker performers and mentor others. While many top employees do enjoy mentoring others, they may well start to feel resentful if they think you’re letting poor performers off the hook.
- High performers are often asked to help on many small matters unrelated to their work. While this issue is often described as a personal problem for people who don’t know how to say no, it could equally be seen as an organisational problem where the busiest, most hardworking people are given more work.
If you are to manage the welfare of your best people, you should become more aware of how these practices affect your business. As well as reducing over-reliance on the top performers, you can also take steps to support your top people, as follows.
High performers are very motivated by their work as a rule. They don’t often get the option to do the projects they care most about unless it happens to also be the hardest project available, or unless they agree to do it on top of their normal work. Let them choose some of their projects. It will reignite their interest in the role.
Create high-performing pairs. High performers are usually separated from those they most closely relate to and enjoy working with. Surrounding them with low performers increases their workload, saps their morale, and limits their development. Pairing two high performers of a similar level can help distribute this added weight and improve high performers’ experience without leaving some teams with no high performers.
Keep track of additional demands on their time. Demands unrelated to core work may individually feel so insignificant that it’s hard to appreciate their combined effect. In many cases, simply keeping track of all the requests in a single place can equip high performers with the awareness that they should turn down some of the incoming requests.
Research published in 2012 by Ernest O’Boyle Jnr and Herman Aguinas suggests that high performers deliver 400% more productivity than their average colleagues. If you don’t take deliberate action to protect your high performers you’ll lose that value.
On a final note you really shouldn’t accept poor work performance. Importantly, you don’t have to.
For help resolving all your HR queries and problems get in touch!
Sign up for our free resources and free weekly tip - subscribe here.
Phone 0345 644 8955
LinkedIn Russell HR Consulting
Although every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this blog, nothing herein should be construed as giving advice and no responsibility will be taken for inaccuracies or errors.
Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved. You may copy or distribute this blog as long as this copyright notice and full information about contacting the author are attached. The author is Kate Russell of Russell HR Consulting Ltd.