Today the Employment Appeal Tribunal gave another important and far reaching judgment in the long running case of Attridge Law v Coleman.
In 2007 Sharon Coleman took her employer, Attridge Law, to court. Ms Coleman is not herself disabled, but she has a son who is. She alleged disability discrimination and constructive dismissal, which she believed occurred as a result of her caring responsibilities for her son (discrimination by association).
The European Court of Justice decided in July that the EU's anti-discrimination laws, which protect disabled people in the workplace, do cover their carers as well. After the ECJ’s judgment, the tribunal found in Ms Coleman’s favour, effectively outlawing associative discrimination.
The employer appealed against the decision, on the grounds that the tribunal had "distorted and rewritten" the DDA. But today, Mr Justice Underhill, the president of the Employment Appeal Tribunal, dismissed the appeal. The ruling means all carers are now protected by anti-discrimination legislation in the workplace.
If they have not already done so, employers should consider whether their equal opportunity, anti-harassment, anti-discrimination and absence policies comply with the law in the light of this decision.
Subscribe to our free monthly HR newsletter. Russell HR Consulting employment law newsletters are emailed automatically to our ever-growing number of subscribers every month.
Latest blog posts
- How to Tell an Employee They Have BO
13 / 07 / 2022
- Embrace Your Anxiety
08 / 06 / 2022
- Surf the Learning Curve
11 / 05 / 2022
- All Change!?
19 / 04 / 2022
- Sourcing Sparkle: Look for Potential Stars
15 / 03 / 2022
- Taking Up Workplace References
15 / 02 / 2022
- Is an Employer Vicariously Responsible for Workplace Jokes That Go Wrong
19 / 01 / 2022
- Zap Frivolous and Vexatious Grievances
23 / 12 / 2021
- Let it snow, Let it snow, Let it snow
09 / 12 / 2021
- The Surprising Benefits of Housework 25 / 11 / 2021